Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47409 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2010 12:49:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Nov 2010 12:49:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 77043 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 12:50:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 76824 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2010 12:50:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 76815 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2010 12:50:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:50:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:50:17 +0000 Received: from sam.nabble.com ([192.168.236.26]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PKVqG-0001of-LM for users@camel.apache.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 04:49:56 -0800 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 04:49:56 -0800 (PST) From: alodde To: users@camel.apache.org Message-ID: <1290430196639-3275297.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: process several instances of one route in parallel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello everybody, I am using camel 2.2 and like to process two instances of a single route in parallel. Currently I am using the processor to achieve this. In cause an exception occurs the whole route should be processed once again. The exception handling and the restart of the route is defined in an onException clause. Everything works fine as long I do not use the threads processor. This is the exception clause I currently using. The dummy queue is not defined. The actually used queue will is set by computeQueue. some.Exception true Does anybody have an idea what could be the problem? I also have some problems to get information about the threads processor. Or is there any other processor, which I could use instead of ? Thx for you help. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/process-several-instances-of-one-route-in-parallel-tp3275297p3275297.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.