Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93795 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2010 13:06:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2010 13:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 17925 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 13:06:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 17815 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2010 13:06:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 17807 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2010 13:06:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:06:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.158 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of k.szczesny@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:06:28 +0000 Received: from sam.nabble.com ([192.168.236.26]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PFRQF-0007m0-56 for users@camel.apache.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:06:07 -0800 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 05:06:07 -0800 (PST) From: Krystian To: users@camel.apache.org Message-ID: <1289221567150-3255019.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1289178017146-3254431.post@n5.nabble.com> <1289209514111-3254779.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Cannot reply to a message routed by camel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It all seems like it's a workaround rather than a fix. I mean... the olution I've got right now is simple and works fine with this one small issue: reply-to queue being changed. Since reply-to queues are changing I believe new ones are created. I'm not sure if that's the case. I cannot see anything in the debug logs, whether there's a queue created or not. That's the mystery. How come reply to queue changes between routed messages. To be honest I thought it would be the same message rerouted all the time with some additional camel-only properties appended to the body. It seems [again] this is not the case. So... to recap. I'm not willing to change the process now [before I see that there's no other option] as all the changes seem to me like resource hogs in situation of let's say 100 000 clients. Different listener groups would mean that the order of messages could get screwed up [at least more screwed up than in original solution]. Any ideas? Thanks, Krystian -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Cannot-reply-to-a-message-routed-by-camel-tp3254431p3255019.html Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.