camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Question on VM Endpoint, multipleConsumers and OSGi
Date Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:54:11 GMT
The NMR can pass in any kind of objects.

Its the JBI which has to normalize to XML. (due the spec. says so)

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:21 AM, klausb <klaus.baumecker@hp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Claus,
>
> I was explicitely heading to camel to avoid XMl marshaling for NMR.
> I need pretty high performance to  pass messages around. Therefore I want to
> leave them in their native format (POJOs). That's where Camel comes along
> very handy.
> At the same time the VM endpoint promised the pub-sub feature which also
> jumps into a requirement.
> Do you have other alternative in mind than using VM for pub-sub with high
> throughput?
>
> Btw. The non-OSGi test to verify my assumption on multipleConsumers with VM
> failed. I created three camel contexts (one sender, two receivers).
>
> klaus.
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Question-on-VM-Endpoint-multipleConsumers-and-OSGi-tp3284450p3285739.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/

Mime
View raw message