Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dwhytock@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=V+d90wiKMlt8yREbhFiQQ9/1ZgQeNIpv6B0hRcl6pfoFlUA1+APfGAXrOYp8T3GnxB
         0ERcb4CitnIXVoDZpLnV090AjZOVKunOR0VhyJjNRmwoFYBOWvtKZyGL4QhLTV8UbX/p
         vR8pjK2LNkf4ojePW9PMlhDR2eEy8EIu/zbrE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin=gXbUs49=yPQjb2QW1WJ5=c4gQJaL=GCxJVgf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimd_izKEdz4atuxu_iJPSQ9DQHttAqrbMBHnovV@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinaN8+1GwYpfKsTzJk6SA7aKCf8F0ZtH12bJ7FW@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik0_qqV9gt0hjDYZJos9LPZP8xENgnpHXZd6Dow@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin=gXbUs49=yPQjb2QW1WJ5=c4gQJaL=GCxJVgf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:58:54 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTin2i61OyWviyTgYCt6bL1c4+cVWYCMYJyava5jG@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: choose() question
From: Donald Whytock <dwhytock@gmail.com>
To: users@camel.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can I chain whens?  As in,
from(endpoint).when(pred1).when(pred2).when(pred3).process(processor),
where processor gets invoked only if all the preds return true?  Or
does a when need to be followed by something-not-a-when?

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can use an interceptor and then stop() when to abort.
>
> Or you can set the Exchange.STOP property on the Exchange from a
> Processor to tell it to stop
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Donald Whytock <dwhytock@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>> Is there something along the lines of an abortable Pipeline, such that
>> it will go through a sequence of processors until one of them returns
>> a certain value, sets a property on the exchange, etc?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Donald Whytock <dwhytock@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
>>>> Hi all...
>>>>
>>>> Newbie question regarding choose(). =A0Given
>>>>
>>>> from(endpoint).choose()
>>>> =A0.when(predA).process(processorA)
>>>> =A0.when(predB).process(processorB);
>>>>
>>>> If predA and predB are both true, do processorA and processorB both
>>>> get called? =A0Or does processing stop with processorA?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Only the first one is chosen. (its not a case, always only 1 at most
>>> is selected)
>>>
>>>
>>>> Don
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Claus Ibsen
>>> Apache Camel Committer
>>>
>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>>> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> Apache Camel Committer
>
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>