Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94678 invoked from network); 10 May 2010 15:25:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 May 2010 15:25:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 99602 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 15:25:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 99573 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2010 15:25:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 99565 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2010 15:25:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 15:25:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cmoulliard@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.173] (HELO mail-wy0-f173.google.com) (74.125.82.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 15:25:23 +0000 Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so1384159wyf.32 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 08:25:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gBv2QLMUrY6HGyidLhJjVR/TGkOBvliMud++KeTUAW8=; b=dVEyqgK8tQxzvEqqzlei4BTXIke6PnvEzFY6d7TG1pnd5Mk5/PrhXapMj41xIe9rvn E0+E08yfQZrr5fhJe7QCieTvQ88JCUR6E35GUMAzQdPzZly2FldPWFFJlWkTIylImlfA 96tgxhPdygPDyezTtWEM8vlg+iMl+AZde8vbY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=pnnkCj0T7uL3NmsfcqY9+xYEytCzMyLsGWX5d4ex24OJq2ozSA/dA0BaCkH0O0I2qX g/wI5obt9zZr1M/Q4KwlGf6VZH3GwAkVDa5wfexiYwGmNxbCC4vVANbphFh1u2EDO0lU jYmnSugaydaowP8U4/fYOu+AyQupqQhSpD0Nc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.90.14 with SMTP id d14mr2513231wef.164.1273505100531; Mon, 10 May 2010 08:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.86.14 with HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 08:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 17:25:00 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Transactional Camel Bean component : Should we define a transacted camel route or not ? From: Charles Moulliard To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, My question is perhaps a little bit trivial but I would like to know if we must design a camel route as transacted when we call from a camel route a camel bean component where we insert data in a DB ? Kind regards, Charles Moulliard Senior Enterprise Architect (J2EE, .NET, SOA) Apache Camel Committer ******************************************************************* - Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com - Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard - Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard