Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37047 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2010 14:03:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2010 14:03:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 81329 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 05:02:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 81275 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2010 05:02:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 81267 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2010 05:02:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:02:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ichsan@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.45] (HELO mail-pw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.160.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 05:02:53 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so1482498pwi.32 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 22:02:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Y+YDNDoWyMjI1G8zhk+nAgQ8yHenypagdo0YIHUSB1Y=; b=D3hOMYnpXUe7UpyYOPNPhYnsG2slDhOIIz8fqO4zFrzK5OlRw/kQuCYJCdx45ziIJn a02S3/zFNQk++xtmZ/COkNrwk4oJ7fdpkLNYVZ6toKd50NI21yjMA253r6TJnk66n7BT AMneztUZ+kA/469/fV1JpJRrB8QvI+/PoWS4I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=trA+GEn/Y/niNFdAvwrMhONMqmXFuXVp/dpYb3+/qmqpag+0okwQIYeCNSKFnYuAz3 OQB6ijZnwXH484AfLHJ9vPlccJL+5VYWoqsa5mXUusby2+guR0a5Vev/ttsbC+rSmz0A Mdj8razST2eNpPkYLTkiVyO4Cw2980e2iYPmc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.173.1 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:02:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28112840.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <28112840.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:02:32 +0700 Received: by 10.143.26.21 with SMTP id d21mr655538wfj.225.1270184552684; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 22:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mina endpoint behaviour From: Muhammad Ichsan To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Ashwin Karpe wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes, they will connect to each other since the URL points to the same host > and port over TCP. There is no point doing this. There is a never ending loop when doing this. I've tried myself. -- ~The best men are men who benefit to others http://michsan.web.id Yang berkualitas memang beda rasanya! http://rizqi-cookies.com