Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45923 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 14:44:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 14:44:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 14617 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 14:44:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 14590 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 14:44:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 14582 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 14:44:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:44:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cmoulliard@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.45] (HELO mail-ww0-f45.google.com) (74.125.82.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:44:53 +0000 Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so879771wwi.32 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:44:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IWqfWbJyJ6IjoMLv3LbxpFYP3duz3VpdfPyJRv9Sk3E=; b=oG5gYOHWgbz0CGEwIdH4UDaCgVORBs6xzIEMlqX0WiszK6DRysdP+3c/k1A9MQfZ6d gp52Btl1KF8lNEJdQNh9etIF8oGd4hGNWVqY84UgooFQOHrRU7Bue+k1jxNVFmkfhTOh XGWW4r0VDsZ+rAZvMrpu4oCEVqWFHdVuASRyI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aEu2qXCYlrLi6ieLGOdZtd69AKEcC9QOLSRILMyPfgQYsMiS2OiphnYgDCkVtl7jq5 njyd5OyPsogEH/vH8esd4B5XJ4Hemyi5UH/5rOsj6Vu0ZqwcbKPHWlXsuFNzoWeXpexl krw13q0WduxdbNDnXDvkZxystBVExqswak2lo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.2 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:44:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BC72464.7090907@progress.com> References: <4BC72464.7090907@progress.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:44:31 +0200 Received: by 10.216.188.77 with SMTP id z55mr206159wem.3.1271342671816; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Integration CORBA with Camel ? From: Charles Moulliard To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fa78e576ace04844788e3 --0016367fa78e576ace04844788e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Ade, Many thanks for the reply and the suggestions. Kind regards, Charles Moulliard Senior Enterprise Architect (J2EE, .NET, SOA) Apache Camel Committer ******************************************************************* - Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com - Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard - Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Adrian Trenaman wrote: > Hi Charles, > > I'm blessed to have quite a lot of experience in CORBA from my past, and, > quite a lot of experience in Camel too ;) > > There are lots of cool, dynamic, sexy ways you could do this. However, I > think that if you're looking to integrate with an existing CORBA service, > the best way is going to be to simply create a CORBA client-side proxy in > the usual way, and invoke on it from within a custom processor. > > from("...") > .process(new Processor() { > myCorbaProxy.doSomething(); > }) > > Using the CORBA DII to do more dynamic invocation would be lots of fun, but > would be a massive amount of work with probably little benefit. Likewise, if > you're trying to invoke a Camel route from a CORBA service, the best way > would be to do a Java CORBA implementation class that invokes on a Camel > route using a ProducerTemplate: the CORBA DSI is going to be overkill. > > Of course, you could even go even closer to the wire and write your own > IIOP codecs for the Mina component in Camel... a huge amount of fun but > months of work with probably very little benefit!! > > Best, > Ade. > > > On 15/04/2010 15:24, Charles Moulliard wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there a way to integrate Apache Camel with a bus CORBA using IIOP >> protocol ? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Charles Moulliard >> >> Senior Enterprise Architect (J2EE, .NET, SOA) >> Apache Camel Committer >> >> ******************************************************************* >> - Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >> - Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard >> - Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard >> >> > --0016367fa78e576ace04844788e3--