Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27076 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2009 17:29:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2009 17:29:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 48316 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2009 17:29:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 48236 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2009 17:29:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 48226 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2009 17:29:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:29:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.210 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.210] (HELO mail-fx0-f210.google.com) (209.85.220.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:29:22 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so1381991fxm.36 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:29:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m/I4splr2JwDXy6gluK2gTzFwQHPLGp2iY8GNUNxOCM=; b=PBHUpU5b2Gob5+EmpGms9ebknV25WPUy+m1NVX1UUKyCiLQKPAM3W96EA/RyYKF9iV asrVEAZlTGcoxwTELoN/L0GzebYiXlsNbdnELRo63zq5TFm8UAK4tg8FvffdFUo3FHJL 6r2uClpsUyaACZSB3SHdntCf80oABfUl93F5o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=soaES8xEjPNDpBSx8ckmuFvlDxKnpgnfcWGcZbg3JBlB7HLaz0RfSqDu0ltOA9bnYm gO5UMxC0NJrBiX4WrPH3Y0T/DFL1u8oKuWmVFXYZ6x7bc1YU7+4w5yzHXMbNHDlGHUiG F8fWSmcGlEJXwpBgPp8CzwSNvY4cgRdxGge/4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.218 with SMTP id y26mr6191095bkw.205.1257787742210; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:29:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <26270070.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <26202573.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AF1D4C4.7090207@die-schneider.net> <5380c69c0911041240s3e0cf124mb3e76036824394f5@mail.gmail.com> <26206508.post@talk.nabble.com> <5380c69c0911042223v24f7e8e7lb9da6a1187d35835@mail.gmail.com> <26230870.post@talk.nabble.com> <5380c69c0911080030h3fe637c3m8ba4e349e23bbb63@mail.gmail.com> <26270070.post@talk.nabble.com> From: Claus Ibsen Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:28:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5380c69c0911090928r545b9522j9d215e9abeb2b7d7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: guaranteed message processing question... To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:14 PM, boday wrote: > > Claus, my questions are really specific to how Camel wraps the underlying= AMQ > technologies. =A0In particular, how Camel handles transactions and client > acknowledgements when exceptions are raised and redelivery policies appli= ed > (using Camel's onException clause, etc). > camel-jms uses Spring DMLC as the message listener. And the spring transaction manager for TX. > Also, I'm not running in DUPS_OK mode explicitly (using AUTO_ACK mode). = =A0But > this seems to be the behavior that I'm seeing... > > On another note, I did purchase the "Camel In Action" pre-release (which = I > see you are an author of) but haven't found much on this specific topic y= et. > Will subsequent chapters will cover this? > Yeah chapter 9 is about transactions. > thanks again... > > > Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Could you ask / search at the AMQ forum. The questions is now more >> related to messaging in general how to do reliable bridges. >> I remember there is also a QoS term (Quality of Service) which specified >> such as >> - duplicates allowed >> - at most one >> - etc. >> >> Try to see if that can help, looks as if duplicates allowed is the >> kind of mode you run with. >> >> > > > ----- > Ben - Senior Consultant > > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/guaranteed-message-pr= ocessing-question...-tp26202573p26270070.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --=20 Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus