Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2813 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2009 21:45:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2009 21:45:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 37529 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 21:45:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 37502 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2009 21:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 37492 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2009 21:45:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:45:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:45:20 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NFE3H-0008U1-Ka for users@camel.apache.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:44:59 -0800 Message-ID: <26582486.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:44:59 -0800 (PST) From: skt99 To: users@camel.apache.org Subject: Re: concurrentconsumers thread safe? In-Reply-To: <26582427.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: sk_telang@yahoo.com References: <26582427.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It appears my configuration did not get copied properly..I am sending it again...thanks. Appreciate any help. skt99 wrote: > > Hi, > I have this configuration - The Spring context is loaded only once on > app startup. An MDP asyncMDPCallback configured as a singleton using > Spring, is setup to consume messages. > > > > > > > > > class="org.springframework.scheduling.concurrent.ThreadPoolTaskExecutor"> > > > > > > class="org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsConfiguration"> > ref="jcaPooledConnectionFactory" /> > > > /> > > > > > class="org.apache.activemq.camel.component.ActiveMQComponent"> > > > > Is this setup for concurrentConsumers using ThreadPoolTaskExecutor > thread-safe by default, or do I need to handle it in my app? Appreciate > any help. > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/concurrentconsumers-thread-safe--tp26582427p26582486.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.