Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31276 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 15:07:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 15:07:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 82939 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 15:07:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 82894 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 15:07:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 82884 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 15:07:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:07:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.207 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.207] (HELO mail-fx0-f207.google.com) (209.85.220.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:07:06 +0000 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so1191771fxm.20 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:06:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=SD9iPLxOPMEvpqsw1QFl8Ni19m4ctELwrsbeJ6OD2LE=; b=mauHLE7Hvxtq6FgWKr6Ljn2ioG5s4bjE5zm3MclRIOavR2sXkRFodhsrfZdcrTvq3F +iF/qMsWOIQAMi6YiNjx9PivfAkLwCYuvmqkF+gXK4MmNw1nc72+Tzb8D3lbjvBImrVm bmf6VfEG32L73PIjQC99e22ta3PBUG+Pxg9ok= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=NfsWNYnv9KXBUgQequA/sGl0+zN6F27o5RW0pP+r8O0KGIDnLcAs2NJOfB1JQzKmxV 2C07n++1msfJk+Z5bhvgd9MNny1b6OWbwGUTTTP1N62mpHW6x7hPcfYQk9fNH2JH6yFg l8IghxlY+0ky+//lzd+lz5TvEsRZfDeiU9S+g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.15.16 with SMTP id i16mr1389373bka.72.1255705606139; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:06:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <25926771.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <25921155.post@talk.nabble.com> <25926771.post@talk.nabble.com> From: Claus Ibsen Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:06:26 +0200 Message-ID: <5380c69c0910160806v19932bbcv6569f715a5aad869@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Camel on Google App Engine To: users@camel.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Martin Krasser wrote: > > Their performance is almost the same. Generating 1 million UUIDs on my laptop > takes about 3 seconds +/- 100ms. UUID tends to be a bit faster than Camel's > UUIDGenerator. > Cool. I also guess SUN/Oracle can improve their UUID over time :) I think you should create a JIRA and provide a patch. > > James.Strachan wrote: >> >> 2009/10/16 Guillaume Nodet : >>> Isn't the activemq uuid generator a lot faster ? >> >> Dunno - have never benchmarked it. >> >> I guess we could either make it configurable; or default to UUID if we >> can't create the default IdGenerator >> >> -- >> James >> ------- >> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source Integration >> http://fusesource.com/ >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Camel-on-Google-App-Engine-tp25921155p25926771.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus