camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <>
Subject Re: JMX in Camel 2.1 - Processor MBeans
Date Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:02:38 GMT
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:57 AM, _Jens <> wrote:
> Just debugged this a bit and it seems that processors have to implement
> Service to be instrumented. The processor for setHeader only implements
> Processor, whereas TransformProcessor extends ServiceSupport.

Ah well spotted. I wonder if we should add management of these micro
processors anyway.
It makes more sense to have processors specific management where you
can manipulate them at runtime.

> _Jens wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I just checked out the new example for the JMX management in Camel 2.1.
>> When I run the example and browse the MBeans with JConsole, I can see all
>> the processors of the route being instrumented. I then added a setHeader
>> to the route, but it was not shown in JConsole. However, a transform step
>> I added as well was shown. What is the plan for instrumenting processors?
>> Will there be some processors of some specific type that are not
>> instrumented? I understand that this is still work in progress, just
>> wanted to know what we can expect.
>> Thanks,
>> Jens
> --
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at

Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer

Open Source Integration:

View raw message