camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JMX in Camel 2.1 - Processor MBeans
Date Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:02:38 GMT
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:57 AM, _Jens <jens.riemschneider@icw.de> wrote:
>
> Just debugged this a bit and it seems that processors have to implement
> Service to be instrumented. The processor for setHeader only implements
> Processor, whereas TransformProcessor extends ServiceSupport.
>

Ah well spotted. I wonder if we should add management of these micro
processors anyway.
It makes more sense to have processors specific management where you
can manipulate them at runtime.


>
> _Jens wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just checked out the new example for the JMX management in Camel 2.1.
>> When I run the example and browse the MBeans with JConsole, I can see all
>> the processors of the route being instrumented. I then added a setHeader
>> to the route, but it was not shown in JConsole. However, a transform step
>> I added as well was shown. What is the plan for instrumenting processors?
>> Will there be some processors of some specific type that are not
>> instrumented? I understand that this is still work in progress, just
>> wanted to know what we can expect.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jens
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMX-in-Camel-2.1---Processor-MBeans-tp25799266p25799847.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer

Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus

Mime
View raw message