camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julien D <myrddi...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: Number of threads created with WireTap
Date Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:15:10 GMT

Ok my problem is that when the thread pool reaches 10 threads, the JVM
doesn't discard them when there is no more activity and I have 10 threads
hanging. Is doing something like wireTap("...").thread(5) will work ?


Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Julien D <myrddin22@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using the wireTap component and when I looked into the code, I saw
>> that
>> it was creating a ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor with 10 threads. It would
>> be
>> useful to control the number of threads created. What do you think ?
> 
> Its using the JDK Executors Service which handles this. The 10 is the
> maximum concurrent threads. Java itself handles how it want to manage
> this.
> 
> We do have on the roadmap to have a nice and easy configurable thread
> pools in Camel. However bare bone the processors do have a
> setExecutorService method
> you can leverage to insert your own custom executors.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> Julien
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Number-of-threads-created-with-WireTap-tp25449550p25449550.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Claus Ibsen
> Apache Camel Committer
> 
> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Number-of-threads-created-with-WireTap-tp25449550p25449955.html
Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message