Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81102 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2009 04:33:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2009 04:33:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 56832 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2009 04:33:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 56795 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2009 04:33:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 56785 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2009 04:33:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:33:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:25:22 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MdGFp-0005Cl-Uk for users@camel.apache.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:25:01 -0700 Message-ID: <25018259.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:25:01 -0700 (PDT) From: snowbug To: users@camel.apache.org Subject: Re: Accessing CamelContext from different applications In-Reply-To: <4A89FB63.2080604@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: laji.inbox@gmail.com References: <24957829.post@talk.nabble.com> <4A85046E.6010507@gmail.com> <25013084.post@talk.nabble.com> <4A89FB63.2080604@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org willem.jiang wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes , you assumption is correct. > If you want to directly talk to camel context in the same JVM, you could > choice direct, seda component. But if you want to do that across the > JVMs, you have to other components :) > > Willem > Thank you for the confirmation. I am quite new to Camel so please allow me to get more clarification on your "other components" comments. My understanding to that is people would need to create JMS (or HTTP, or other) component in the Camel app to allow other apps to send messages to it, and the same time create application specific components in the Camel app to send messages from the Camel app to other apps? Thanks for you help, Alan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Accessing-CamelContext-from-different-applications-tp24957829p25018259.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.