camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Why does the transform() processor not propagate attachments?
Date Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:55:37 GMT
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Fintan Bolton <fbolton@progress.com> wrote:
>
> I noticed that in the latest source code, the implementation of the
> transform() processor does not propagate any attachments. Is there a reason
> for that? Could it be a bug?
Yeah well spotted its a bug.

However Attachments is now often used in Camel and was introduced in
1.4/1.5 so it was not there from the start and thus some processors
dont propagate them.

I have fixed it.

> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-does-the-transform%28%29-processor-not-propagate-attachments--tp22676886p22676886.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer

Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message