Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63059 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 07:08:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 07:08:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 14554 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 07:08:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-users-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 14536 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 07:08:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 14525 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 07:08:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 14522 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 07:08:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:08:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:07:56 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LbrOB-0000Na-FC for camel-user@activemq.apache.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:07:35 -0800 Message-ID: <22176938.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:07:35 -0800 (PST) From: huntc To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Subject: Is Mina custom codec overriding text line codec MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: huntc@mac.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi there, I think I may have found a problem: mina:tcp://0.0.0.0:8201?textline=true&textlineDelimiter=WINDOWS&sync=false&minaLogger=true If I use the above while having already registered some other Mina endpoints that have their own codec, I think that the text line options become confused. In fact if I set a breakpoint in a previously registered codec then I find that the codec's decoder is invoked when I send stuff to port 8201... I've ran out of time to experiment further with this today. Meanwhile if there are any thoughts on this potential issue then please feel free to air them. %-| Kind regards, Christopher -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Mina-custom-codec-overriding-text-line-codec-tp22176938p22176938.html Sent from the Camel - Users (activemq) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.