Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 56670 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2008 15:39:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Dec 2008 15:39:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 40421 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2008 15:39:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 40409 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2008 15:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact camel-user-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list camel-user@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 40398 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2008 15:39:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:39:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:39:42 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LCc13-0003Rb-6T for camel-user@activemq.apache.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:39:21 -0800 Message-ID: <21035441.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:39:21 -0800 (PST) From: dougly To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Multiple Running Context In-Reply-To: <5380c69c0812152107laec0dd2o338807d210e804c0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: dmly.usa@gmail.com References: <21022918.post@talk.nabble.com> <5380c69c0812152107laec0dd2o338807d210e804c0@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Claus, I just tested the routes in our apps. Even with two separate running contexts I am able to see messages flowing between them! Whether this is a actual camel issue or jconsole issue (or even possibly, the MBean part of Camel issue) I don't know. Thanks Doug Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: > > Hi > > I guess you might have found an issue there, or at least in the jconsole. > > Does the endpoints/consumers etc. work, but it's only the jconsole not > showing the correct picture? > I guess we need some unit tests with multiple context in the same > spring xml file. > > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:04 PM, dougly wrote: >> >> Hi riders, >> Is Camel 1.5 supporting multiple running context? I am trying to setup >> two >> contexts in the same web application and it's not functioning properly. >> Here is the config: >> >> > id="camel_email_context"> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > id="memoCreationContext"> >> >> >> >> >> >> I use jconsole to view the consumer/endpoints. The 2 contexts are created >> OK. But their endpoints/consumers are all messed up: >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p21022918/ScreenShot001.jpg >> >> As you can see in the screenshot: only one consumer is created. The >> "memoCreationContext" is not. >> Also the endpoints of that "memoCreationContext" doesn't contain anything >> except the Spring event. >> >> Thanks guys >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Running-Context-tp21022918s22882p21022918.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > > /Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Running-Context-tp21022918s22882p21035441.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.