Mailing-List: contact camel-user-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <56b1dfc30810011205j7adab77s7a08c79819768803@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:05:38 -0700
From: "Mick Knutson" <mknutson@baselogic.com>
To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: issue routing Exchange to custom method in Processor
In-Reply-To: <56b1dfc30810011202s66dbe021s6d2139d7ce1095b1@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_63644_13755017.1222887938873"
References: <56b1dfc30809301239l792c9a06n51cbb959abe1ef03@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4C1FB9C00D24A140906239533638C4D2058FB2C2@EXVS04.exserver.dk>
	 <56b1dfc30810011202s66dbe021s6d2139d7ce1095b1@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_63644_13755017.1222887938873
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

It almost appears that there might be some issue with mock endpoint
resetting?


On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Mick Knutson <mknutson@baselogic.com>wrote=
:

> I am going crazy here (literally).
>
> This is all I know at this point.
>
> If I use this method exacly as I have it (endpoint names), then all my
> tests pass as expected. But if I change anything in the endpoint names, e=
ven
> to be mock:success, verse mock:success1 then several of my tests fail wit=
h
> messages not getting routed correctly:
>
>     *public void testCreateInvalidChangeRequest(String
> inputDestinationURI,
>                                                String messageInputBody,
>                                                String messageOutputBody
>     )
>             throws Exception {
>
>         MockEndpoint mockFailureEndpoint =3D getMockEndpoint("mock:failed=
1
> ");
>         MockEndpoint mockSuccessEndpoint =3D getMockEndpoint("mock:succes=
s1
> ");
>
>         mockFailureEndpoint.expectedBodiesReceived(messageInputBody);
>         mockFailureEndpoint.expectedMessageCount(1);
>         mockSuccessEndpoint.expectedMessageCount(0);
>
>         try {
>             camelContext.addRoutes(new RouteBuilder() {
>                 public void configure() throws Exception {
>                     from("direct:start1")
>                             .errorHandler(deadLetterChannel("mock:failed1
> "))
>                             .process(changeRequestProcessor)
>                             .to("mock:success1");
>                 }
>             });
>
>             producerTemplate.sendBody("direct:start1", messageInputBody);
>
>             Assert.fail("Should have thrown a RuntimeCamelException");
>         } catch (RuntimeCamelException e) {
>             //assertIsInstanceOf(e, IllegalArgumentException.class);
>             assertIsInstanceOf(e, RuntimeCamelException.class);
>         }
>
>         testMocksAreValid();
>
>         MockEndpoint.assertIsSatisfied(mockFailureEndpoint,
> mockSuccessEndpoint);
>
>     }
> *
>
> I have attached my basetest, and this test in question as well.
>


--=20
---
Thank You=85

Mick Knutson
BASE Logic, inc.
(415) 354-4215

Website: http://baselogic.com
Blog: http://baselogic.com/blog
BLiNC Magazine: http://blincmagazine.com
Linked IN: http://linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
DJ Mick: http://djmick.com
MySpace: http://myspace.com/mickknutson
Vacation Rental: http://tahoe.baselogic.com

------=_Part_63644_13755017.1222887938873--