Mailing-List: contact camel-user-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: issue routing Exchange to custom method in Processor
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:22:24 +0200
Message-ID: <4C1FB9C00D24A140906239533638C4D205716B17@EXVS04.exserver.dk>
In-Reply-To: <56b1dfc30809290912u1075892uffc7c97d2e996e2e@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: issue routing Exchange to custom method in Processor
Thread-Index: AckiTe2vj7slRxUVRh2TNT8jlPt1sAACdAKA
From: "Claus Ibsen" <ci@silverbullet.dk>
To: <camel-user@activemq.apache.org>

Hi

I don't think you should have both @MessageDriven and Processor in the =
same java class. You should separate these two. This is not commonly =
used.


Med venlig hilsen
=20
Claus Ibsen
......................................
Silverbullet
Skovsg=E5rdsv=E6nget 21
8362 H=F8rning
Tlf. +45 2962 7576
Web: www.silverbullet.dk
-----Original Message-----
From: Mick Knutson [mailto:mknutson@baselogic.com]=20
Sent: 29. september 2008 18:12
To: Camel; Active MQ
Subject: Re: issue routing Exchange to custom method in Processor

Can someone help me?

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Mick Knutson =
<mknutson@baselogic.com>wrote:

> The funny thing is, when I have an error with the message coming from =
this
> queue, which I do because process(Exchange) does not expect my message =
body,
> the message gets routed to the proper deadLetter channel.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Mick Knutson =
<mknutson@baselogic.com>wrote:
>
>> I have a Processor with 2 different methods:
>>
>> The standard:
>> *public void process(Exchange exchange) {
>> *
>>
>> and a custom:
>>
>>     *@MessageDriven(uri =3D Constants.CHANNEL_GG_CS_COMMAND_STATUS)
>>     public void onMessage(Exchange exchange) *
>>
>> Now here is my route:
>>
>>        * from(Constants.CHANNEL_GG_CS_CR_ADD)
>>                 .errorHandler(
>>
>> deadLetterChannel(Constants.CHANNEL_GG_CS_CR_ADD_ERROR)
>> //.maximumRedeliveries(2)
>>                                 //.initialRedeliveryDelay(1)
>>                                 .loggingLevel(LoggingLevel.DEBUG)
>>                 ).processRef("changeRequestController")
>>                 .to(Constants.CHANNEL_GG_CS_COMMAND_CLUSTER);
>>
>>
>>         // Route for command status updates.
>>         from(Constants.CHANNEL_GG_CS_COMMAND_STATUS)
>>                 .errorHandler(
>>
>> =
deadLetterChannel(Constants.CHANNEL_GG_CS_COMMAND_STATUS_ERROR).maximumRe=
deliveries(2)
>>                                 .initialRedeliveryDelay(1)
>>                                 .loggingLevel(LoggingLevel.INFO)
>>                 =
).to("bean:changeRequestController?methodName=3DonMessage");
>> *
>>
>> So when I get a message on *Constants.CHANNEL_GG_CS_CR_ADD my
>> process(Exchange) method is called, and that rout is fine.
>>
>> However, I get a response message back on =
**Constants.CHANNEL_GG_CS_COMMAND_STATUS
>> but it is also processed by *the *process(Exchange) instead of my
>> onMessage**(Exchange)*
>>
>> I have tried @MessageDriven annotation as well as the route builder =
but
>> neither works.
>>
>> Am I forced to have each process in a single class?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> Thank You...
>>
>> Mick Knutson
>> BASE Logic, inc.
>> (415) 354-4215
>>
>> Website: http://baselogic.com
>> Blog: http://baselogic.com/blog
>> BLiNC Magazine: http://blincmagazine.com
>> Linked IN: http://linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
>> DJ Mick: http://djmick.com
>> MySpace: http://myspace.com/mickknutson
>> Vacation Rental: http://tahoe.baselogic.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ---
> Thank You...
>
> Mick Knutson
> BASE Logic, inc.
> (415) 354-4215
>
> Website: http://baselogic.com
> Blog: http://baselogic.com/blog
> BLiNC Magazine: http://blincmagazine.com
> Linked IN: http://linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
> DJ Mick: http://djmick.com
> MySpace: http://myspace.com/mickknutson
> Vacation Rental: http://tahoe.baselogic.com
>
>


--=20
---
Thank You...

Mick Knutson
BASE Logic, inc.
(415) 354-4215

Website: http://baselogic.com
Blog: http://baselogic.com/blog
BLiNC Magazine: http://blincmagazine.com
Linked IN: http://linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
DJ Mick: http://djmick.com
MySpace: http://myspace.com/mickknutson
Vacation Rental: http://tahoe.baselogic.com