Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 5864 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2008 09:52:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Sep 2008 09:52:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 4823 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2008 09:52:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 4806 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2008 09:52:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact camel-user-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list camel-user@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 4795 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2008 09:52:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:52:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.69.129.177] (HELO exsmtp01.exserver.dk) (195.69.129.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:51:15 +0000 Received: from EXVS04.exserver.dk ([10.10.10.84]) by exsmtp01.exserver.dk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:49:11 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [SPAM] Re: Can DeadLetterChannel be used in Transaction? Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:51:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4C1FB9C00D24A140906239533638C4D2053706D5@EXVS04.exserver.dk> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [SPAM] Re: Can DeadLetterChannel be used in Transaction? Thread-Index: AckSYOQXYNTLP+biTNqPnrSbhs8wGQAAJV5w From: "Claus Ibsen" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2008 09:49:11.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[4F7EFDA0:01C91261] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org There is a bug in the delay stuff. CAMEL-706 is the ticket for this one. Med venlig hilsen =20 Claus Ibsen ...................................... Silverbullet Skovsg=E5rdsv=E6nget 21 8362 H=F8rning Tlf. +45 2962 7576 Web: www.silverbullet.dk -----Original Message----- From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com]=20 Sent: 9. september 2008 11:47 To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Subject: [SPAM] Re: Can DeadLetterChannel be used in Transaction? 2008/9/9 Claus Ibsen : > Hi > > I am thinking about for starters just to support: > - delay settings for the transactionalErrorHandler Great! Though TransactionInterceptor does have the RedeliveryPolicy for setting the delay? Or maybe there's a bug and its not being used? > Then we can later find a suitable strategy for the max redeliver if = its possible and a feature we would like to have in Camel. Great. For things like JPA/Hibernate we'd need to keep an LRU cache of entity types and their primary keys to keep track of retry counts in the JVM. > I will also create a sample with ActiveMQ to show how configure it to = set the maximum redeliver and its error queue as a sample for Camel. = Many end-users use Camel + ActiveMQ so a good example would be nice. Great! --=20 James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://open.iona.com