Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 47524 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2008 15:38:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Sep 2008 15:38:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 1230 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2008 15:38:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 1207 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2008 15:38:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact camel-user-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list camel-user@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 1196 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2008 15:38:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:38:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:37:52 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KkhIw-0004yN-4G for camel-user@activemq.apache.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:38:26 -0700 Message-ID: <19744627.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:38:26 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lukasz L." To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: 'from' changes semantics? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: Lukasz.Lichota@sabre.com References: <19743553.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I did checking how many threads are running manually, any idea how to automate it? James.Strachan wrote: > > 2008/9/30 Lukasz L. : > >> I tried to use thread pool and it works if I specify: >> XXX.setBody(body(String.class)).to("seda:test"); >> from("seda:test").thread(3).XXX >> >> but it does not work when I use it like this: >> XXX.setBody(body(String.class)).to("seda:test").thread(3).XXX >> >> why is that? > > Sounds like a possible bug with the seda endpoint? It should work > AFAIK. Any chance of a failing JUnit test case? > > -- > James > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%27from%27-changes-semantics--tp19743553s22882p19744627.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.