camel-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet" <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Camel in a Clustered Environment
Date Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:30:47 GMT
I don't think the scenario you describe is doable.  Camel does not offer any
transparent clustering, so if you create a route with multiple steps, all
the steps should be included in a single transaction, so that the whole
route will be rolled back if something bad happens.  If the route begins
with a JMS endpoint, you could easily set up persistence, transaction and
all the QoS needed at this point.

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:37 PM, chintaka <chintakar@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I am curious to know how camel will behave in the following setting :
>
> 1) You have multiple clusters (A and B)
> 2) Each cluster has a copy of camel route for redundancy and load
> balancing.
> 3) Router in cluster A is executing a routing slip type process(a process
> with multiple steps), at this point if the cluster A goes down router in
> cluster B should pickup the routing ?
> 4) If so what happens to state of the message that router in cluster A
> started executing ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chintaka
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Camel-in-a-Clustered-Environment-tp16571337s22882p16571337.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message