Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 25451 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2008 16:38:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2008 16:38:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 9751 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2008 16:37:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 9726 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2008 16:37:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact camel-user-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list camel-user@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 9717 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2008 16:37:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:37:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.189] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:37:17 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d27so1483333tid.0 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:37:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=tgSXFLXONfPbL/8weqG/6uompx4N5CIjerlsRxtufDg=; b=DDwFFL3QlvbCOmzgHpvky4YaeuMLXEXbBJL97wbe7YbpwjiHJ7OjTKLBPWehsvrZeVDxk7GImnd4taxla5n1o7OReOBV3MftivlYnUGfIsewbbaO62ghZcVQbmGF52kKEP9qHxJqP3iGNNMHyEpldJNif0YrjvMD/8qeb7rizCg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Xu7Gu8TMdY4MUL000tuKt76JzAkXL5B/P7Uykj80PW8wcSTitUlTsbXXFnImUw8FS6xcGpJdZWhVUv9JNo+oZVHmeWkwJBZTbtidyEYJpcDQQhFllZqr83kNVoB7YKAMyArUfCtEpL9DcNKRWz6ballCPolEs/uAWEbY3lN54Os= Received: by 10.150.135.2 with SMTP id i2mr925343ybd.38.1206635846974; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.148.20 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:37:26 +0000 From: "James Strachan" To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting lots of TIME_WAIT sockets In-Reply-To: <16327772.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <16119896.post@talk.nabble.com> <16176219.post@talk.nabble.com> <16177002.post@talk.nabble.com> <16249938.post@talk.nabble.com> <16252432.post@talk.nabble.com> <16327772.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 27/03/2008, DominicTulley wrote: > > Our default setup has multicast discovery turned off so it's unlikely that's > involved (however I guess it's not hard to turn it off to check in the SVN > builds). > > Did you see my post from earlier today about lsof not showing TIME_WAIT > sockets? Yeah - how are you viewing the TIME_WAIT sockets? > I'll happily turn on logging and give it a pop - is there anything more > appropriate than the whole of Camel at DEBUG? Its probably the ActiveMQ logging thats more useful to be honest; its the thing that'll be creating sockets etc. I guess Spring logging might describe why its not using CACHE_CONSUMER etc. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://open.iona.com