Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 13684 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2007 05:41:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2007 05:41:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 53454 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2007 05:41:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-camel-user-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 53440 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2007 05:41:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact camel-user-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list camel-user@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 53431 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2007 05:41:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:41:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.237 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.237] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 05:41:06 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 25so106071wry for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:40:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CoHy5u4VFVD6ofBknPfgawYPzSlhbKKNkhKEo1BAZTqt+GNTGWiCU+RAscEZQoSfBmRUVxMwmvjYsIYbwd1ndYxWzTQvvVpyDW0iYwbUW+qncdJWyyjyxQlc27hlmFRgR5DUZaP1jxs71BWEz9R23JOqZLi2BHFprHgvvyNy9/w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=feOhsJDJWd4irHDspKThjZFgdV/FOIHQZ0uzfxm9kUJkO0KWxFRQd/QWaQ4nNt332yq2sS+oT3X/xe4x4GuCKW3mUHhS6JRLF5P/M+imdU7rm1lCqH/oFYEcz4yHT+awYi2uZCCIm57nhRD943R/BA2xBd2LDEPPtbnaFjXb7BQ= Received: by 10.90.118.8 with SMTP id q8mr1872231agc.1187242844965; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.67.18 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:40:44 +0100 From: "James Strachan" To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Is Camel IoC container friendly? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 8/16/07, mat wang wrote: > Is Camel IoC container friendly? Great question. The quick answer is yes, absolutely! I've added a more detailed FAQ entry to properly answer this.. http://cwiki.apache.org/CAMEL/is-camel-ioc-friendly.html -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/