Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AC2200C2C for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:00:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D5430160B80; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C36F160B57 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:00:53 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 449 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2017 16:00:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 440 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2017 16:00:52 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 16:00:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7ED42C0349 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:00:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.451 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.451 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UoEu9enzl72I for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id F20BA5FB1E for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 02FACE0944 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 35E512416A for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:00:47 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ryan Yeats (JIRA)" To: issues@camel.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (CAMEL-10918) JMS 2.0 shared subscriptions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 16:00:54 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15894616#comment-15894616 ] Ryan Yeats edited comment on CAMEL-10918 at 3/3/17 4:00 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ To be honest that is what I thought was going to happen which wouldn't have been a big deal for me since I am using artemis but never the less I tested it with activemq and karaf and surprisingly it worked fine other than the no such method exception when I tried to do something only supported by JMS 2.0. The only troubling thing for me is its not clear to me exactly why that was possible either I thought I would get some sort of class miss-match exception. I'm tried it with both both oracle jdk and open jdk to make sure it wasn't something jdk specific also java version "1.8.0_121" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-b13) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode) openjdk version "1.8.0_121" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-1~bpo8+1-b13) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode) was (Author: ryeats): To be honest that is what I thought was going to happen which wouldn't have been a big deal for me since I am using artemis but never the less I tested it with activemq and karaf and surprisingly it worked fine other than the no such method exception when I tried to do something only supported by JMS 2.0. The only troubling thing for me is its not clear to me exactly why that was possible either I thought I would get some sort of class miss-match exception. I'm tried it with both both oracle jdk and open jdk to make sure it wasn't jdk specific also java version "1.8.0_121" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-b13) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode) openjdk version "1.8.0_121" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-8u121-b13-1~bpo8+1-b13) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode) > JMS 2.0 shared subscriptions > ---------------------------- > > Key: CAMEL-10918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10918 > Project: Camel > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: camel-sjms > Reporter: Ryan Yeats > Priority: Minor > > This is presumptions of me and I apologize for that and will understand if this is closed outright but I was going to fork camel-sjms and add support for some JMS 2.0 for my own uses and during testing found out that it was still backwards compatible and figured I would contribute it back if you guys found it worth maintaining. > Tested this on karaf 4.10 with activemq 5.14.3 shared subscriptions caused a NoSuchMethodException as expected but everything else seemed to work. Also tested on karaf 4.10 with artemis 1.5.1 shared subscriptions worked. > Here is the changeset: > https://github.com/ryeats/camel/commit/80f875572ffd2a16ec24d9302479201dc9b188f6.patch -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)