Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFDC200BC2 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:13:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3DAB3160AFB; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 83A24160B0A for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:12:59 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 65264 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2016 11:12:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 65245 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2016 11:12:58 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 11:12:58 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE412C1F5A for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:12:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Christian Schneider (JIRA)" To: issues@camel.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (CAMEL-10433) The camel-jetty, camel-jetty9 feature should explicitly define the expected feature version range for jetty MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 11:13:00 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Schneider resolved CAMEL-10433. ----------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.16.5 2.17.4 I did not mean to commit in spite of Andrea's comments. I only checked the issue before the merge. At that point there were no comments. I always try to discuss before the commit if there is a controversy. In the meantime Andrea and I resolved the issue on IRC. We agreed on this: The change is not be necessary if people follow the karaf guidelines but it should not do any harm. So we can keep the commit. > The camel-jetty, camel-jetty9 feature should explicitly define the expected feature version range for jetty > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CAMEL-10433 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10433 > Project: Camel > Issue Type: Bug > Components: karaf > Affects Versions: 2.16.3, 2.17.3 > Environment: Java 8 > Reporter: Xilai Dai > Assignee: Christian Schneider > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.17.4, 2.16.5 > > > There is no version range restriction of jetty feature in the camel-jetty and camel-jetty9 feature definition. > {code} > jetty > {code} > For camel-jetty9 feature, it maybe should add version range like this: > {code} > jetty > {code} > For camel-jetty feature, it maybe should add version range like this: > {code} > jetty > {code} > Because from karaf 4.x there are both jetty 8 and jetty 9 feature existing. Making this changes will avoid install the wrong version jetty bundles when install camel-jetty (or camel-jetty8 of Camel 2.17.x) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)