camel-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-9498) Always provide a writable local registry
Date Fri, 25 Nov 2016 13:25:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15695862#comment-15695862
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CAMEL-9498:
---------------------------------------

Github user yuruki closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/822


> Always provide a writable local registry
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-9498
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9498
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>            Reporter: Jyrki Ruuskanen
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Many Camel components need to reference objects in CamelContext's registry as part of
their configuration (for example httpClientConfigurer for http/http4 and restletRealm for
restlet).
> These objects often apply to that particular CamelContext and not others, thus the registry
holding these bits could be local instead of, say, OSGi service registry. Using a local registry
prevents the risk of conflicting keys and spares us from devising a naming policy for even
trivial stuff.
> To conveniently create and add these objects, even from inside RouteBuilder's configure
method, we need write access to said registry.
> CamelContext should, in my opinion, provide a local SimpleRegistry that is always available.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message