Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EA6C1828D for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33767 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2015 08:05:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 33731 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2015 08:05:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 33720 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2015 08:05:05 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:05:05 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:05:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" To: issues@camel.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (CAMEL-8994) Large memory use on Large core count(512) servers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-8994: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 2.14.4 > Large memory use on Large core count(512) servers > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CAMEL-8994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8994 > Project: Camel > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: camel-core > Affects Versions: 2.14.3 > Reporter: Zoltan Farkas > Fix For: 2.16.0, 2.15.3, 2.14.4 > > > ConcurrentLinkedHashmap get huge on these servers (200 +Mb) > There are some CPU related defaults + Some padding that are the source of this, more discussion at: > https://github.com/ben-manes/concurrentlinkedhashmap/issues/43 > upgrading to a newer version should remove the padding and reduce memory usage... > Another thing I noticed that is related, is that LRUCache > default initial size is equal with maximum size... which is 1000, would it make more sense to have a lower default for initialSize? (64) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)