camel-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-8421) Add minimum age option to readLock=changed
Date Thu, 05 Mar 2015 06:03:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14348208#comment-14348208
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CAMEL-8421:
---------------------------------------

Github user yuruki closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/414


> Add minimum age option to readLock=changed
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-8421
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8421
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core, camel-ftp
>            Reporter: Jyrki Ruuskanen
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.15.0
>
>
> I'm a fan of noop=true in file consumers since it means I don't have to worry about how
many readers I have and where. But eventually I came across a scenario where current features
are not sufficient.
> Let's say we have a source system which writes files with name <timestamp>_something.xml,
and it won't use temp files or .done marker files or anything like that. We want to get the
latest file as soon as it's created. Consider the following route:
> {code}
> from("file:////somewhere/data?noop=true&include=.*_something[.]xml&readLock=changed&sortBy=file:name")
> 	.aggregate(constant(true), new UseLatestAggregationStrategy()).completionFromBatchConsumer()
> 		.to("amq:topic:something");
> {code}
> When this route is started it will go through the files in order and get the last one.
Then it will wait for new files. This works fine as long as the writer is not "slow".
> Now, we had cases of incomplete files being read and I was requested to not to read the
file before it is 10 minutes old, just in case. If I increase readLockCheckInterval to 10
minutes getting to the latest file at route startup will take close to forever. The current
readLock=changed implementation always sleeps for at least one readLockCheckInterval per file.
> If we had readLockMinAge option to define the minimum age for the target file the consumer
could acquire readLock on the first poll and breeze through the files until too young a file
is reached.
> The route below would poll a file every 500ms (default poll delay), while the current
readLock=changed would take 1500ms (default poll delay + default readLockCheckInterval) per
file. Consumer goes through the files until it hits the end and gets the last one as soon
as it becomes old enough.
> {code}
> from("file:////somewhere/data?noop=true&include=.*_something[.]xml&readLock=changed&readLockMinAge=600000&sortBy=file:name")
> 	.aggregate(constant(true), new UseLatestAggregationStrategy()).completionFromBatchConsumer()
> 		.to("amq:topic:something");
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message