Mailing-List: contact issues-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:35:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12770518.1422400232000.202230.1422513335413@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12770518.1422400232000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12770518.1422400232000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12770518.1422400232115@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-8288) Attach Lucene Documents to the
 Results(Hits) if header contains RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS=true
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14296450#comment-14296450 ] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-8288:
------------------------------------

Is it not better to add an option to the endpoint you can turn on|off whether to include docs? 

Something like:
{code}
to("lucene:searchIndex:query?analyzer=#stdAnalyzer&indexDir=#std&maxHits=20&includeDocs=true").
{code}

> Attach Lucene Documents to the Results(Hits) if header contains RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS=true
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-8288
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8288
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-lucene
>            Reporter: Kranti Parisa
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.15.0
>
>
> Current Hits result only contains the lucene docId, score and assuming there will be a field with the name "contents". 
> This feature will allow specifying a new header value 
> {code}
>  .setHeader("RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS",constant("true"))
> {code}
> and return the actual lucene documents part of the Hits for further processing. This will allow us to retrieve any field from the actual lucene document. 
> Both Lucene component and LuceneQueryProcessor should support this new header.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)