Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21DC6117AE for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78226 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2014 05:50:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 78188 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2014 05:50:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 78178 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2014 05:50:24 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:50:24 +0000 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:50:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" To: issues@camel.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-7015) Allow timeout on the first Exchange for aggregator MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14041728#comment-14041728 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-7015: ------------------------------------ What is the idea with the maxCompletionTimeout? Will it not confuse end users that there is 2 timeouts now? > Allow timeout on the first Exchange for aggregator > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CAMEL-7015 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-7015 > Project: Camel > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: ChrisS > Assignee: Willem Jiang > Labels: features > Original Estimate: 168h > Remaining Estimate: 168h > > It would be nice to have a possibility of a timeout starting from the first Exchange for messages having the same correlationExpression when using Aggregation. > This scenario is currently not supported because "Its a bit tougher to implement as it would require an improvement to TimeoutMap to support that as well." > The full scenario is described in this thread: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/A-simple-Aggregator-use-case-td5743633.html#a5743634 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)