Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47303100A6 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84595 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2013 15:56:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 84553 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2013 15:56:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 84546 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2013 15:56:35 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:56:35 +0000 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:56:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "metatech (JIRA)" To: issues@camel.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (CAMEL-6994) Camel load balancers should be restartable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] metatech updated CAMEL-6994: ---------------------------- Attachment: camel_load_balancer_restartable.patch > Camel load balancers should be restartable > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: CAMEL-6994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6994 > Project: Camel > Issue Type: Bug > Components: camel-core > Affects Versions: 2.8.5 > Environment: ServiceMix 4.4.2 > Reporter: metatech > Priority: Minor > Attachments: camel_load_balancer_restartable.patch > > > When a route containing a load balancer is restarted, after the restart, the route does not contain any processors within the load balancer. > This is because the processors are removed in "doStop", rather than in "doShutdown" in LoadBalancerSupport. > Here is a patch that fixes the problem. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1#6144)