Mailing-List: contact issues-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 21:33:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Chris Geer (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12634497.1362001607508.367148.1362173593585@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12634497.1362001607508@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12634497.1362001607508@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-6108) Refactor JMS Component to use JTA
 Transactions instead of Spring Transactions
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590957#comment-13590957 ] 

Chris Geer commented on CAMEL-6108:
-----------------------------------

I guess my main driver for wanting to refactor the current JMS component is that the ActiveMQ component actually extends from it which means the ActiveMQ component is tied to Spring as well. I'm ok changing to using the SJMS component instead of the ActiveMQ component as long as I can get similar capabilities.

Is there any benefit to have an ActiveMQ specific component that extends from SJMS?
                
> Refactor JMS Component to use JTA Transactions instead of Spring Transactions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-6108
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6108
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-jms
>            Reporter: Chris Geer
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> We love contributions as you know. May you find time to work on it?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira