camel-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-6108) Refactor JMS Component to use JTA Transactions instead of Spring Transactions
Date Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:27:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590674#comment-13590674
] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-6108:
------------------------------------

Yes Scott I agree. camel-jms should IMHO be *as-is* using the Spring API and what it offers.
And spring TX can already support JTA / XA and local jms TX as well.

So this does not make sense for me to change camel-jms.

What is needed though is those related issues to add TX to OSGi blueprint that uses the JTA
API.

For camel-sjms it makes sense to support the JTA API.
                
> Refactor JMS Component to use JTA Transactions instead of Spring Transactions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-6108
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6108
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-jms
>            Reporter: Chris Geer
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> We love contributions as you know. May you find time to work on it?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message