Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28CF0E1D2 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45486 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2013 11:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-issues-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 45425 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2013 11:28:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 45396 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2013 11:28:12 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:28:12 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:28:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" To: issues@camel.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (CAMEL-5918) Add performance tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5918?page=3Dcom.atlassia= n.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-5918: ------------------------------- Issue Type: New Feature (was: Improvement) =20 > Add performance tests > --------------------- > > Key: CAMEL-5918 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5918 > Project: Camel > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: camel-test > Affects Versions: 2.9.5, 2.10.3 > Reporter: Christian M=C3=BCller > Assignee: Christian M=C3=BCller > Fix For: 2.8.7, 2.9.6, 2.10.4, 2.11.0 > > > By working on the "ESB Performance Testing - Round 7" (http://www.esbperf= ormance.org/) to provide a good/optimal ServiceMix & Camel test set up I fi= gured out, the performance for most of the test cases are worse by upgradin= g from ServiceMix 4.4.2 (which use Camel 2.8.5) to ServiceMix 4.5.0-SNAPSHO= T (which use Camel 2.10.3). > The reason for this does not have to be a worse performance in Camel, but= it could. In these performance tests, I use ServiceMix/Karaf, Jetty, CXF, = ... and Camel of course. > To make sure the performance is not getting worse in a new Camel release,= I will add a few different performance test in the next days/weeks for the= most relevant use cases and the tests made by esbperformance.org. These te= st should not be executed by default on the CI server. But we should run th= e tests regularly from time to time and before we cut a new release. We als= o can use these tests to profile Camel and check we can improve the perform= ance, independently how good the performance already is. > I'm wondering what is the best place for this module. I suggest camel/tes= ts/camel-performance. I don't know what the intension was for the existing = camel/tests/camel-itest-performance module? It doesn't contain performance = tests... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrato= rs For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira