Mailing-List: contact issues-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:24:35 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <1298933082.3576.1341415475233.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm>
Subject: [jira] [Created] (CAMEL-5420) Camel transforms relative uri in a
 bad way
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Guillaume Nodet created CAMEL-5420:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: Camel transforms relative uri in a bad way
                 Key: CAMEL-5420
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5420
             Project: Camel
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.10.0
            Reporter: Guillaume Nodet


When defining an endpoint with a relative uri such as 
   protocol:mypath1/mypath2
camel transforms the given uri into the following:
   protocol://mypath1/mypath2

Note that this transformation is performed before the component is given the uri as it is done in DefaultCamelContext#getEndpoint() in the call to normalizeEnpointUri().

This has the big problem that mypath1 is not considered the path anymore, but rather the authority (host:port).

So if a component wants to support both relative and absolute uris, it has no real way to know if the original uri contained an authority or not.
It is possible to support absolute uris with no authority though, as
   protocol:/mypath1/mypath2
is converted to
   protocol:///mypath1/mypath2

I'm not sure why relative uris are transformed into absolute uris, which does not really seem like a good idea to me.


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira