Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93862009DC for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 21:14:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D7CC2160BAB; Tue, 2 May 2017 19:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 03F99160B9D for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 21:13:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 61109 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2017 19:13:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 61097 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2017 19:13:58 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 May 2017 19:13:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6E4E9C04EF for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 19:13:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.693 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.693 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m10XOEfE5cx2 for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 19:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com (mail-qk0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E9C1D5F4A7 for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 19:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r189so25778136qkf.1 for ; Tue, 02 May 2017 12:13:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4NVZmSoMiYsvV11gk29qERffJAW3BJ61kK4Ciyf7g60=; b=VsIxJktHgMri9+B4VEeY8ppHfN/cW8mtry8Ot45PIzlVE09u5onj0WRlg0jZQt3sOn HFFSdHfX3MHbQDp4nfkNEYOdNLaZtt2mSZw0Rhbxxt+oYfjaEPIPsUrBBQJfley4iLSi 2uxu0fAb3vppg0ws2vlRGmsa2CG1YHPAuHa5BzVz/8FYgm2q+XYfWEqDXoklqZMnmB9g RyGdOPrRlAwZLeB8aqyNm+uBtY8ttsmhVLDkbvDBc/S44j0uS5vAgV1u2WXd35REwdPj P/rry+PO1WdUwaMSEXBw+T+iSNI0iisCLWuXqPMhVfFi8DAkV/Pmvq7XGlErGoY1WqFc sUXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4NVZmSoMiYsvV11gk29qERffJAW3BJ61kK4Ciyf7g60=; b=GFQAbe1+ugLt7GQ7/EgzJ3a52euxSrYQ6h4DdQNGBbF0rB8B/lv/km7GrfvyYfZNVK lFvPlBLkomYF01pG6+Qq1rJj1JqMZb5Wm0Aivn7+jNLqZFbLMYaU9vodrd7oTamO13Zz 5WDOq0LrR4iEcP+dkxu9vLMNh52GpT2aGKrFLYcLrcokSSl9iFM7bUX3t1iF4gxFqE3F iu5oNTyLv5FlpZm8lW2n6+BWmcuU5n91XQpHNVchgeEbyxH7WF8hdF0Iyvy+Za9JeXPM jML+y8P3ryQJe6o+FrtUHjrRRk3aN9jRotZT+QzVqZ8cOa28y0eeKkQ7jbJfo/4d3tXD 7aqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/47d62h5wX5OMd08YFiCWAgDkD4Lou+vYRXlsfCrwsF6ZPK2s2z yV8FwNTmrKqBbhjz3z6YBtsOOLT1VlMPI0A= X-Received: by 10.55.102.8 with SMTP id a8mr16374105qkc.66.1493752436459; Tue, 02 May 2017 12:13:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.50.39 with HTTP; Tue, 2 May 2017 12:13:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <06103e99-92a7-8621-268b-6b064ec8aec7@gmail.com> From: Claus Ibsen Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 15:13:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.19.0 (Attempt #2) To: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Tue, 02 May 2017 19:14:01 -0000 On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Marco Collovati wrote: > Ok, sorry. > Oh dont be, we value all feedback. What you have discovered is likely something we can improve for the next release. You are welcome to dive in the source code, and and we love contributions. PRs is welcome http://camel.apache.org/contributing And if you find that field vs getter is in more places then maybe post on @dev so the other devs can take notice and we can take a bigger look. However if its only a few spots then a PR and a JIRA is fine IMHO. > BTW, aside from my previous problem, I tested RC on some production project > involving camel-jms, camel-cxf, camel-mail and > camel-api-component-maven-plugin and all is working fine. > Ah great thanks for testing and the feedback. > > > On 02/05/2017 20:39, Claus Ibsen wrote: >> >> Hi Marco >> >> You should likely post a new thread with more details what you are trying >> to do. >> Your use-case is not normal and therefore not considering a blocker. >> There are likely other places where such check in doStart is checking >> the field also. >> >> The RC testing is more focusing on existing applications being >> migrated or ported to this versions to find regressions etc. >> >> >> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Marco Collovati >> wrote: >>> >>> -1 >>> >>> Got an issue with DefaultComponent change on doStart method: >>> the check for camel context is done via getter >>> ```ObjectHelper.notNull(getCamelContext(), "camelContext");``` >>> but the following logic access the `camelContext` field directly. >>> >>> This leads to NPE when extending DefaultComponent as a decorator for >>> other >>> components. >>> >>> Maybe this is more an issue on my code but I think the camelContext check >>> should be consistent with the following code. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2017 17:32, Gregor Zurowski wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Everyone: >>>> >>>> This is the second vote to release Apache Camel 2.19.0, a new minor >>>> release with over 670 new features, improvements and bug fixes. A >>>> summary of the changes is available in the Camel wiki [1]. The first >>>> vote was cancelled due to multiple issues found while testing the >>>> first release candidate [1]. >>>> >>>> Release notes: >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12337871&projectId=12311211 >>>> >>>> Staging repository: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1075/ >>>> >>>> Tarballs: >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1075/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.19.0/ >>>> >>>> Tag: >>>> >>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=0ae39c5223d4e58e1f3063e7e5f071be0e258e97 >>>> >>>> Please test this release candidate and cast your vote. >>>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.19.0 >>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) >>>> >>>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Due to the many changes introduced with this new release, it would be >>>> beneficial if we could get as many Camel riders involved in testing >>>> this release candidate as possible. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Gregor >>>> >>>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+2.19+Release >>>> [2] >>>> >>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-19-0-td5798264.html >>>> >>> >> >> >> > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2