camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Siano, Stephan" <stephan.si...@sap.com>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..
Date Thu, 14 Jul 2016 06:32:39 GMT
What's wrong with using selectors? You are using a shared queue for different endpoints, so
in my opinion that's a very good reason for using a selector. How do you want to dispatch
your reply messages to different endpoints without selectory? 

-----Original Message-----
From: James Carman [mailto:james@carmanconsulting.com] 
Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2016 13:11
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..

Shared uses selectors. There's no reason to use selectors in my case

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 6:31 AM Siano, Stephan <stephan.siano@sap.com>
wrote:

> If you want to share a replyTo queue the replyToType is Shared, not
> Exclusive, so this should already be supported, or do I geth something
> wrong here?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Carman [mailto:james@carmanconsulting.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 12. Juli 2016 15:47
> To: dev@camel.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..
>
> I am not talking about using a Shared reply queue.  I'm talking about using
> Exclusive.  The idea would be to be able to send messages, using a
> ProducerTemplate or something, like this:
>
> jms:queue:foo?replyToType=Exclusive&replyTo=REPLIES&concurrentConsumers=5
> jms:queue:bar?replyToType=Exclusive&replyTo=REPLIES&concurrentConsumers=5
>
> Right now, this doesn't work.  Is there any reason folks can think of that
> we wouldn't or couldn't support such a thing?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:50 AM Siano, Stephan <stephan.siano@sap.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi James,
> >
> > I am not sure whether I understand the context. Are you talking about
> > request/reply over JMS with the camel-jms component?
> >
> > In that case the replyToDestinationSelectorName parameter might help you
> > with shared reply to queues. I actually do not see any impact that may
> have
> > on transactions. I haven't tried that out myself, though.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Stephan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Carman [mailto:james@carmanconsulting.com]
> > Sent: Montag, 11. Juli 2016 16:29
> > To: dev@camel.apache.org
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..
> >
> > Right now, you must have a unique reply to queue for each destination.
> > Would there be any impact of allowing folks to use a single reply to
> queue
> > for all destinations?  For example, suppose I want to use an "Exclusive"
> > reply to queue per node within my cluster, but I want all replies (for
> all
> > routes) to go to REPLY_TO.<hostname>.  Would this impact transactions?
> Is
> > this doable?
> >
>
Mime
View raw message