camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Siano, Stephan" <stephan.si...@sap.com>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..
Date Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:31:06 GMT
If you want to share a replyTo queue the replyToType is Shared, not Exclusive, so this should
already be supported, or do I geth something wrong here?

-----Original Message-----
From: James Carman [mailto:james@carmanconsulting.com] 
Sent: Dienstag, 12. Juli 2016 15:47
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..

I am not talking about using a Shared reply queue.  I'm talking about using
Exclusive.  The idea would be to be able to send messages, using a
ProducerTemplate or something, like this:

jms:queue:foo?replyToType=Exclusive&replyTo=REPLIES&concurrentConsumers=5
jms:queue:bar?replyToType=Exclusive&replyTo=REPLIES&concurrentConsumers=5

Right now, this doesn't work.  Is there any reason folks can think of that
we wouldn't or couldn't support such a thing?


On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:50 AM Siano, Stephan <stephan.siano@sap.com>
wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> I am not sure whether I understand the context. Are you talking about
> request/reply over JMS with the camel-jms component?
>
> In that case the replyToDestinationSelectorName parameter might help you
> with shared reply to queues. I actually do not see any impact that may have
> on transactions. I haven't tried that out myself, though.
>
> Best regards
> Stephan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Carman [mailto:james@carmanconsulting.com]
> Sent: Montag, 11. Juli 2016 16:29
> To: dev@camel.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Reusing Exclusive ReplyTo Queue..
>
> Right now, you must have a unique reply to queue for each destination.
> Would there be any impact of allowing folks to use a single reply to queue
> for all destinations?  For example, suppose I want to use an "Exclusive"
> reply to queue per node within my cluster, but I want all replies (for all
> routes) to go to REPLY_TO.<hostname>.  Would this impact transactions?  Is
> this doable?
>
Mime
View raw message