Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA00618E7C for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86641 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2015 18:02:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 86595 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2015 18:02:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 86583 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2015 18:02:16 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 18:02:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C292C1A082B for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:02:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.213 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.213 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MU2GPAZyM2j6 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0892442BA0 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so41140776wic.0 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:02:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eK7N/u09/HbV/qovPKj/0Y3h1l1cCfPl+KIlalrE0Rs=; b=iSpqlOCRTx3f9P2cf6X2VhNVDX4a4TFYLzXXI4cejmuNiV4XBJ2a9G9U9PAhkI2BlD prGhZ5dRMoH/S0C7vV3dIRfLZDD9ZInKy4g3UpAPmffQiMZufDgywbWMq3PLYkB9nZcq zfh/Fdyg6kqAhfEdbSnAA4OknXagkOKbyYGPaEY0vkB4VTAxCyakPHEfabeu0OUa6cMo hWZ5vx2QKVBk8a4GMMYRAny7+EqVJ7a6nr/hIVWQLylnB6ewpALTmYgfPIXuRSRhTI2K 6DUJj08OD4QQ+Hce85lyuuf8QiavDTdZkU9RFGbIgXAo1THjS7lLpUQS+G6Mly04Q1gU uiKw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.88.74 with SMTP id be10mr16853162wjb.67.1443808924121; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.238.201 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: david@davidkarlsen.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 20:02:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Camel WXS component From: David Karlsen To: dev@camel.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf198ba0bc793052122f649 --047d7bf198ba0bc793052122f649 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Trying again since the last attempt did not get through... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Karlsen Date: 2015-09-29 15:39 GMT+02:00 Subject: Camel WXS component To: dev@camel.apache.org I got a bit inspired by the contribution of a camel cics component to camel extras here the other day, so I whipped up a camel-wxs component: https://github.com/davidkarlsen/camel-extra/tree/camel-wxs . Would you care to give feedback (coding style, test approach, naming etc etc)? WXS is an elastic caching/grid solution from IBM: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSTVLU_8.6.0/ Currently it only contains an implementation of ExchangeIdempotentRepository . I thought of extending it in case a generic camel-cache component came to existence: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/An-idea-of-new-camel-cache-endpoint-td5753363.html The tests are currently based on mocks as it would be hard to [legally] provide integration-tests running on the proper software from IBM as it's commercial. What are your thoughts? -- -- David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen -- -- David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen --047d7bf198ba0bc793052122f649--