camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: camel-jetty artifact name issue
Date Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:04:55 GMT
+1 to include the Jetty9 upgrade into Camel 2.15.0.

--  
Willem Jiang

Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang  
Weibo: 姜宁willem



On March 6, 2015 at 10:53:53 PM, Christian Schneider (chris@die-schneider.net) wrote:
> I agree with Dan and Claus that we should use camel-jetty9 as the
> default. With the short support periods of jetty we should suggest to
> that the new verson is the prefered one.
> I can tackle the version upgrade
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8451).
>  
> Christian
>  
> On 06.03.2015 15:32, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > I’d greatly prefer to leave the current setup and document/release note that the
user  
> needs to explicitly select which version they need or want to use.
> >
> > If we have to rename one, rename jetty9. Jetty8 is EOL and I would not want it to
be the “default”  
> going forward. (that said, we need to get the jetty 9 up to 9.2.9 level due to a security
 
> issue in 9.2.7)
> >
> > The setting in the Karaf features file can be a bit different as they would depend
on what  
> version of Karaf it’s using. Not much we can do about that as it’s whatever the Karaf
community  
> decided. Outside Karaf, we can at least provide the more secure alternative as the default.
 
> >
> > Dan
> >
>  
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>  
> Open Source Architect
> http://www.talend.com
>  
>  


Mime
View raw message