Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F765C3BC for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43901 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2014 09:36:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 43857 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2014 09:36:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 43837 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2014 09:36:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:36:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elakito@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.51] (HELO mail-la0-f51.google.com) (209.85.215.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:36:26 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ms9so2047057lab.38 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 01:36:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B5t3mTuU7x7HlbQO7CVqskdSdypr7LgEyLGVuoGij78=; b=q+2QQSNUTGQlD4WgyGv4umnucfm1J9s3ecrWOdPicepy3Q23XGaVB5n0Ix8HnhC7Ee wvC6LEjK6pwjyxpiv6UD0kdrkW+/tR2gpCyjMBnShLX+EwM8EQJ+5WGxP+nl7kzxLAIY TpNMJbZdWzxmQ9i1PKNJVmIqkjad0yaV+cxC04RlbimaFWlL1bxW7HTwM+MsbKdhBgvN izscizsBqx2hWqGNZyChubfDa3OGlhDBErYSJCLFDAIqm2+7pDMo7WB3sWA2Py8p9SeH xDVIw2SvHNZZrvq8GufzifqxjTPBT37JFkqJtuyU4aXeBm773j9eAD6I+HRvsoK39Fso U2Ug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.5.38 with SMTP id p6mr2956880lap.91.1418204185525; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 01:36:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.16.160 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 01:36:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <002c01d01453$2f58bc50$8e0a34f0$@de> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:36:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: But in xtokenize() ? From: Aki Yoshida To: "dev@camel.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I replied to your "camel -xsd" thread at users@camel. I think that clarifies your question. regards, aki 2014-12-10 10:27 GMT+01:00 Aki Yoshida : > The test cases are spread in several places depending on the test types. > > For the iterator-level tests, those XMLTokenExpressionIterator*Test.java = in > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=3Dcamel.git;a=3Dtree;f=3Dcamel-= core/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/support/ > > > For the xtokenizer-level tests, those XMLTokenize*Test.java in > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=3Dcamel.git;a=3Dtree;f=3Dcamel-= core/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/language/tokenizer/ > > regards, aki > > > 2014-12-10 9:27 GMT+01:00 Jan Mat=C3=A8rne : >> I played a little bit with the new split().xtokenize() method (user list >> "camel - xsd" thread). >> >> And I have seen a bug - but I am not sure whether it's in the computer o= r in >> front of ;) >> >> >> >> Where are the unit tests for xml splitting with xtokenize()? >> >> >> >> >> >> Jan >>