Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.12.3
From: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <1392977527050-5747739.post@n5.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:45:25 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8249D55A-5B27-46FA-8BA7-C38A9CFC06AA@apache.org>
References: <1392631591037-5747421.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <5304BBD4.8060505@gmail.com> <1392823196265-5747563.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <5304D004.8060601@gmail.com>
 <CAD0r13esLTQ9qmQ867HcqQ+35wveRgD-tsdPxoX33VANacNE=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <001201cf2e07$5ccb7480$16625d80$@de>
 <812E5217-AF43-4E99-92FB-52DF15D58A67@apache.org>
 <CA+QaCWKOcKuuydDjfqJJkY8PNdh6sFYSpROdN=MC91wAZXQ2og@mail.gmail.com>
 <53064B25.1030700@gmail.com>
 <etPan.5306fa77.6b8b4567.9f@Willems-MacBook-Pro.local>
 <1392977527050-5747739.post@n5.nabble.com>
To: dev@camel.apache.org


On Feb 21, 2014, at 5:12 AM, Babak Vahdat <babak.vahdat@swissonline.ch> =
wrote:

> Thanks Willem, that's just awesome!
>=20
> To reflect your fix I enabled the 'apt' profile by our POMs *per =
default*
> and also activated the corresponding tests on Java 6 as well.

If things are working with both 6 and 7, is there any reason for the apt =
profile at all?    Can we just remove it?

Dan


>=20
> The commit has been also backported to the 2.12.x branch.
>=20
> Looking forward for the upcomming 2.12.3 release!
>=20
> Babak
>=20
>=20
> Willem.Jiang wrote
>> I already fixed the issue, and ran the prepare release process with =
JDK6.
>> The html document can be generated without any trouble.
>>=20
>> Please hold you commit to camel-2.12.x until you see the new tag is
>> created.
>>=20
>> -- =20
>> Willem Jiang
>>=20
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> Web: http://www.redhat.com
>> Blog: =
http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
>> (English)
>> http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
>> Twitter: willemjiang =20
>> Weibo: =E5=A7=9C=E5=AE=81willem
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On February 21, 2014 at 2:36:51 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea (
>=20
>> hzbarcea@
>=20
>> ) wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Willem, if that problem was so important to you to block a release =20=

>>> then
>>> it needs to be fixed. Until it's fixed I will -1 a release. It =
either =20
>>> is
>>> important or it isn't.
>>>=20
>>> Hadrian
>>>=20
>>> On 02/20/2014 12:26 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks for the inputs.
>>>>=20
>>>> The annotation is already RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME.
>>>>=20
>>>> Current the html generator is based the APT processor, But it =20
>>> looks like
>>>> JDK6 has some trouble to load the APT processor when compile =20
>>> the code, I=E2=80=99m
>>>> not sure if I can fix it tomorrow.
>>>>=20
>>>> At mean while, I suggest we can spend some time to address this =20
>>> JDK compile
>>>> issue after Camel 2.12.3 is released, so it won=E2=80=99t block the =
ActiveMQ =20
>>>> release.
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> View this message in context: =
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-12-3-tp57473=
61p5747739.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--=20
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com