camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Mock Objects for Hazelcast Unit Tests...
Date Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:26:17 GMT
JB,

I have used EasyMock in the past and that's fine if that's what this
project has standardized upon, but I must suggest we take a look at
Mockito.  I was recently turned on to Mockito and it really puts the
"easy" in EasyMock (something they neglected to do I guess :).

James

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> it sounds good to me. I would advice Easymock.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 10/04/2013 03:06 PM, James Carman wrote:
>>
>> As opposed to using a real HazelcastInstance, I would like to change
>> the tests to use mock objects (using Mockito or something).  There is
>> no real reason to use a live, running Hazelcast instance in a unit
>> test and it makes the unit tests very slow.  Perhaps having a couple
>> of tests that test the integration would be fine, but having every
>> single test running against a real Hazelcast instance is just too time
>> consuming.  Thoughts?
>>
>> James
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Mime
View raw message