Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cschneider111@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.128.41 as permitted sender)
Sender: Christian Schneider <cschneider111@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <521C932B.6070703@die-schneider.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:53:15 +0200
From: Christian Schneider <chris@die-schneider.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Camel 2.12.0 release
References: <26DDC2942FD542CA8207A60BA37C93E5@gmail.com>
 <521C854A.1030902@die-schneider.net>
 <CAGB5yNmeUf30FXRmF4VWSq5Di0FEZUrGbbW0LOGhW-LK+mBYFQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGB5yNmeUf30FXRmF4VWSq5Di0FEZUrGbbW0LOGhW-LK+mBYFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Sorry for not checking this more thoroughly.
Yes. The camel feature file does not reference activemq.

I just tested my camel tutorial example with camel 2.11.1 and activemq 
5.7.0. The problem I face there is that activemq 5.7.0 does not work on 
karaf 2.3.x
because it requires a blueprint version <1.0.0. So the problem is still 
there but it is not related to camel.

On activemq 5.8 on the other hand the whole broker creation and 
blueprint support does not work.

So all fine with the camel release. The problem is on activemq side.

Do you know when activemq 5.9 is scheduled?

Christian


On 27.08.2013 13:16, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> I cannot see how this related to Apache Camel?
>
> At Apache Camel we do not have any OSGi imports/features for Apache ActiveMQ.
> Its "the other way around". ActiveMQ has a Camel module, and its own
> feature files.
>
> And the OSGi problems in AMQ 5.8.0 has been fixed on trunk and will be
> in the upcoming 5.9 release.
> And AMQ 5.9.0 will use the Apache Camel 2.12 release.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Christian Schneider
> <chris@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>> We currently have some issues with ActiveMQ 8 on OSGi.
>> Would it make sense to switch back to ActiveMQ 7 in the feature and possibly
>> for imports for 2.12.0?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27.08.2013 11:52, Willem jiang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm planing cut the Camel 2.12.0 release 12 hours later (About 27 August
>>> 2013, 10 PM  GMT).
>>> Please don't commit any code at that time and make sure the code you
>>> commit don't break any thing if you had to commit the code today.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Willem Jiang
>>>
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> Web: http://www.redhat.com
>>> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
>>> (English)
>>>             http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
>>> Twitter: willemjiang
>>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Schneider
>> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>>
>> Open Source Architect
>> http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Open Source Architect
http://www.talend.com