camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zemian Deng <saltnlig...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: About the spi-annotations dependency
Date Sun, 11 Aug 2013 03:33:03 GMT
Babak, thanks for the good tips using -Papt. I think I know what's going on
my env now.

When I run command line "mvn idea:idea", the profile "apt" IS picked up
since I am using JDK7. When I do this, I can open the project in Intellij
and everything works fine now!

What I had trouble before is because I did not run "mvn idea:idea", but
simply open the camel/pom.xml from my Intellij IDEA (this is how I normally
open most of typical Maven project and they work fine, even with
multi-modules). However this method will not enable the camel "apt" profile
for some odd reason, and thus all the @UriParam is un-resolvable. Perhaps
this is just Intellij bug or some sort.

So I am good now. I don't have to manually adjust any classpath in IDE if I
first run "mvn idea:idea" first.

Thanks!
-- Zemian


On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Babak Vahdat
<babak.vahdat@swissonline.ch>wrote:

> I used to have the same problem with eclipse BUT using Java 6 for which
> I've
> added a "note" about it while ago (see the green box below):
>
> http://camel.apache.org/building.html
>
> That said your Java 7 build seems to be pretty old which may cause this
> problem (I've got
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_40.jdk/Contents/Home/jre)
>
> Can you try setting the apt profile explicitly to see if that would help:
>
> mvn -Papt idea:clean idea:idea
>
> Babak
>
>
> saltnlight5 wrote
> > Hi Babak,
> >
> > I use these:
> >
> > zemian@ZEMIANs-iMac:~/projects/camel
> > bash> mvn -version
> > Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
> > Maven home: /Users/zemian/apps/maven
> > Java version: 1.7.0_11, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> > Java home:
> > /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_11.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
> > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> > OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.8.4", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Babak Vahdat
> > &lt;
>
> > babak.vahdat@
>
> > &gt;wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Which Java version do you use for building, 6 or 7?
> >>
> >> Babak
> >>
> >> Am 10.08.2013 um 14:51 schrieb Zemian Deng &lt;
>
> > saltnlight5@
>
> > &gt;:
> >>
> >> > Willem,
> >> >
> >> > I will vote to make spi-annotation non-optional in camel-core since it
> >> only
> >> > has 4 classes, and they are already used in quite of few sub modules.
> >> >
> >> > But if you stick to optional in camel-core, then any modules that uses
> >> > @UriParam should has a hard dependency on spi-annotation, not
> optional.
> >> We
> >> > should add spi-annotation in camel-jms/pom.xml as regular dependency.
> >> Here
> >> > is a list of modules that I can see using @UriParam:
> >> >
> >> > camel-jms
> >> > camel-salesforce
> >> > camel-sap-netweaver
> >> > camel-sjms
> >> > camel-sql
> >> > camel-ssh
> >> > camel-twitter
> >> > camel-weather
> >> > camel-yammer
> >> >
> >> > Same need to be check on other annotations usage, which I haven't
> >> check.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Willem jiang &lt;
>
> > willem.jiang@
>
> > &gt; >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> How about add the spi-annotation dependency as optional in the
> >> >> camel-jms/pom.xml?
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Willem Jiang
> >> >>
> >> >> Red Hat, Inc.
> >> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> >> >> Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
> >> >> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com
> >> (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/
> >> )
> >> >> (English)
> >> >>          http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
> >> >> Twitter: willemjiang
> >> >> Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 at 9:01 AM, saltnlight5 wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have a question on camel pom usage.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> In camel-core/pom.xml, the spi-annotations dependency is added
as
> >> >>>
> > <optional>
> > true
> > </optional>
> > , however other modules such as
> >> >> camel-jms/pom.xml
> >> >>> do not include this dependency explicitly. Is that intentional?
How
> >> does
> >> >>> camel-jms resolve this spi-annotations jar if it's only optional
> from
> >> the
> >> >>> core?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> When I use IntelliJ IDE to open the camel project, and it complains
> >> the
> >> >>> @UriParam is not resolvable in JmsEndpoint.java until I add this
> >> >>> spi-annotations into camel-jms/pom.xml. I wonder if any of you
> >> experience
> >> >>> this, or just my misunderstanding of the maven usage?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Zemian
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/About-the-spi-annotations-dependency-tp5736873.html
> >> >>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com
(
> >> >> http://Nabble.com).
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/About-the-spi-annotations-dependency-tp5736873p5737074.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message