Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hzbarcea@gmail.com designates
 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <517595CA.6070104@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:55:54 -0400
From: Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - Last Camel 2.9.7 release and retire this branch
References: 
 <CAGB5yNk_n7ZQowrg7v-g6RC09YasxL5pZXTtXT+_cCkatpOFDw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALvzYd_C4WfiZFw-1=kK_qdtF5W6uvaY49DUCeChQN11G-3HFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALvzYd_C4WfiZFw-1=kK_qdtF5W6uvaY49DUCeChQN11G-3HFA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Agree. Let's shoot for next week, end of this month.
Hadrian

On 04/22/2013 07:03 AM, Christian M�ller wrote:
> +1 for releasing it shortly.
>
> Sent from a mobile device
> Am 22.04.2013 09:36 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> When 2.11.0 is GA, we should IMHO do a last 2.9.x release, and then
>> retire that branch.
>> Though 2.9.6 was released in early March. So when would be a good time
>> to do that last 2.9.7 release? Should we wait a bit till eg june, or
>> should we release it sooner?
>>
>> Its just that if we got trunk, 2.11, 2.10. and 2.9 braches, then there
>> is a lot to maintain.
>> So I dont think there is much activity on the 2.9 branch.
>>
>> Also the 2.9 branch is now 16 months actie maintained.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>>
>