camel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de>
Subject AW: http://camel.apache.org/bean-binding.html#BeanBinding-Parameterbinding
Date Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:18:25 GMT
cool ;)

Jan

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Willem jiang [mailto:willem.jiang@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Februar 2013 02:37
An: dev@camel.apache.org
Betreff: Re: http://camel.apache.org/bean-binding.html#BeanBinding-Parameterbinding

Hi Jan,

Thanks for the pointing that out, it makes document more easy to understand.
FYI I just updated the document with your suggestion.


--
Willem Jiang

Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)
          http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem





On Thursday, February 7, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:

> In the examples there is a method
> public String doSomething(String body) with a String as return type.
> Directly under that this is written
> "Or the Exchange example. Notice that the return type must be void 
> when there is only a single parameter:"
>  
> How does that fit - void return type and String return type?
> Is the rule "void return type when one parameter" only valid for 
> Exchange-parameters?
> Then it would be clearer to write that "Or the Exchange example. 
> Notice that the return type must be void when there is only a single 
> parameter of type Exchange:"
>  
>  
> Jan




Mime
View raw message