Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:45:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Babak Vahdat <babak.vahdat@swissonline.ch>
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Message-ID: <1353480337234-5723042.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <50AC2BCE.5070907@gmail.com>
References: <CCD11518.2E32%babak.vahdat@swissonline.ch>
 <F555FD0CC85345D6B2DD8A27E4EFC18C@gmail.com> <50AC2BCE.5070907@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Any good reason why make use of the
 java.io.File.getAbsoluteFile() API inside the unit-tests
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Hadrian,

I was *not* looking for any +1 but only wanted to *make sure* that there's
*no* good reason I'm missing here why there're *tons* of this call. So that
I though I should better ask other experienced riders before I start
removing (almost) all of those 226 calls!

~/dev/workspace/camel>find . -name *Test.java -exec grep "getAbsoluteFile()"
{} \; | wc
     226    1034   15850

Babak 


hadrian wrote
> Unfortunately, it won't save any testing time as this is just a teeny, 
> tiny drop in the bucket, but it's a bit ugly.
> 
> Babak, you don't need a bunch of +1s, just go ahead and fix it :).
> 
> Thanks,
> Hadrian
> 
> On 11/20/2012 08:07 PM, Willem jiang wrote:
>> +1 to remove that to save us some testing time :)
>>


--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Any-good-reason-why-make-use-of-the-java-io-File-getAbsoluteFile-API-inside-the-unit-tests-tp5722995p5723042.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.