Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of christian.mueller@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALhQg-YS88RQ=DXqbnt9y=QT2VMaCuvi9b4c=TUcmZpYiNfrqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CALhQg-YS88RQ=DXqbnt9y=QT2VMaCuvi9b4c=TUcmZpYiNfrqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:12:38 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CALvzYd-JysGPFrWqVTrmObGVrE0TXbGmZcKPCogC98cFFNoACw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Camel Extra 2.10.0 release - review
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christian_M=FCller?= <christian.mueller@gmail.com>
To: dev@camel.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb2db68f35204caa07227

--20cf300fb2db68f35204caa07227
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I will do a dry run today or tomorrow...

Best,
Christian

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Henryk Konsek <hekonsek@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to release Camel Extra 2.10.0 at Friday.
>
> Anybody wants to raise some blocking issues? From my point of view the
> Camel Extra codebase is ready to go.
>
> BTW From Camel Extra 2.11 I would like to introduce more formal way of
> releasing the version. We could start with PMC voting for the release
> to be ready (yeah, I'm aware of the fact that Apache PMCs formally do
> not manage Apache Extras). I raised an issue [1] for that.
>
> After 2.10.0 release and 2.10.1 release I will polish Camel Extra
> documentation and test coverage.
>
> Laters.
>
> [1]
> http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=29
>
> --
> Henryk Konsek
> http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
>


--

--20cf300fb2db68f35204caa07227--