Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C45ADB76 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 05:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91226 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2012 05:45:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-camel-dev-archive@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 91173 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2012 05:45:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@camel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@camel.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@camel.apache.org Received: (qmail 93291 invoked by uid 99); 24 Sep 2012 17:50:45 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of arepaka@hotmail.com does not designate 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:50:19 -0700 (PDT) From: "arepaka@hotmail.com" To: dev@camel.apache.org Message-ID: <1348509019317-5719867.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1348183696636-5719695.post@n5.nabble.com> <1348247879030-5719731.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Is camel-beanio working ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes Claus, it works fine when I run it as a unit test. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Is-camel-beanio-working-tp5719695p5719867.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.